|
Post by humgoo on Oct 13, 2020 6:10:47 GMT
Lynne Truss - Possunt quia posse videntur (Woman's Hour 50th Anniversary Short Story Collection, 1996) Thanks a lot for giving us the lowdown on it! Another mystery on The James Gang list gone! I hope you will write more about these little gems!
|
|
|
Post by dem on Oct 13, 2020 18:17:57 GMT
John Lymington – The Forger's Gloves: ( The Night Spiders, 1964). Larry the master counterfeiter is murdered by rival Jack Culip, a man so parsimonious he can never throw anything away. True to form, Culip keeps the gloves he stole from Larry so as not to leave fingerprints. They prove supernaturally loyal to their late owner.
|
|
|
Post by dem on Oct 20, 2020 8:28:58 GMT
A haunted portrait - fashion victim hybrid from the superlative SpellboundGIRL IN THE RED DRESSSpellbound #15, 1st January 1977
|
|
|
Post by dem on May 15, 2021 7:43:40 GMT
Andrew Brosnatch J. U. Giesy - The Magic of Dai Nippon: Dream Hypnotism — and the Kimono of Death. Faithful servant Yamato bides his time, patiently awaiting the perfect moment to crush the affluent white man who ruined his sister. The instrument of his vengeance — the most beautiful silk garment.
|
|
|
Post by dem on May 25, 2021 10:24:29 GMT
Illustrated Police News, 28 March 1868. L R Gustavson Norman Matson - The Woman in Scarlet Stockings: ( Mystery, Aug. 1934). An old house, a young wife, an indifferent husband, and the weird ghost-woman make this story a dramatic masterpiece of chills and creeps you will never forget! A perfect haunted-house mystery - that might actually have happened! Bunny and Eleanor Brooks move in at a lonesome country farmhouse, a mile from the high road. It's haunted by the living ghost of an old woman, Matilda Bliven, who regularly glares in through the windows, and/or attempts to gain entrance. Thirty years ago, her sister, Bertha, hung herself in and upstairs room, Matilda arriving home from the church too late to save her. She will never rest until she has.
|
|
|
Post by Swampirella on May 31, 2021 18:25:28 GMT
Adam J. Marsh - Raspberry Beret - Fifth BHF Book of Horror Stories
Unnamed school-girl narrator's mother buys her the raspberry beret she's found while browsing in a second-hand store. Should cover her unfortunate baldness due to cancer treatment nicely. It turns out there's something very strange about that headgear....
|
|
|
Post by Jojo Lapin X on May 31, 2021 18:45:08 GMT
Adam J. Marsh - Raspberry Beret - Fifth BHF Book of Horror Stories
Unnamed school-girl narrator's mother buys her the raspberry beret she's found while browsing in a second-hand store. Should cover her unfortunate baldness due to cancer treatment nicely. It turns out there's something very strange about that headgear....
Did she walk in through the out door?
|
|
|
Post by weirdmonger on Jul 24, 2021 12:24:00 GMT
Aickman's "Ravissante" isn't primarily about togs, but it does have an inimitably strange plunge into a drawer. Mind you, "The Residence at Whitminster" gives you a good reason not to open one. RAVISSANTE by Robert Aickman “One trouble was that I most certainly did not want to understand everything.” “If one goes to parties or meets many new people in any other way, one has to take protective action…” RAvissante— upon my re-reading of it, just now — has jumped back, like the “black poodle” of the less-than-ravishing Madame A., into an erstwhile twin-souled sump as the formative religious experience it once was, now further evolved. A story imparted by the less-than-ravishing Aickman himself whereby his drag often drags? The story that will either change your life or make you abandon it altogether! It reminds me of my own thoughts about creating stories or arguably outlandish reviews of them like this one, if one equates them with RA’s ‘pictures’ in this story, viz: “My pictures are visionary and symbolical, and, from first to last, have seemed to be painted by someone other than myself. […] I am thus entirely self-taught, or taught by that other within me. I am aware that my pictures lack serious technique(if there is a technique that can be distinguished from inspiration and invention). I should have given up painting them some time ago, were it not that a certain number of people seemed to find something remarkable in them, and have thus identified me with them, and made me feel mildly important.” But then I address RA’s later explicit destruction in this story of my beliefs in ‘The Intentional Fallacy’ with regard to his narrator’s inner narrator’s view of paintings and painters, with this narrator uselessly seeking to know everything about each painter as a personality and a biography. So, I now flounder in finding a meaning in this work by RA without knowing more about RA himself. But I want to deal with it empirically or objectively without recourse to such biographical information. Therefore, let’s now go through the story during a new tranche of real-time… viz. The first narrator — having met the second narrator (whose narration of his earlier meeting with Madame A. in Belgium comprises the full final two-thirds of the story’s whole) — is made executor (alongside the second narrator’s mostly silent wife) of the second narrator’s Will. The latter’s paintings and manuscripts, mainly. Is the remarkable painting — seen in Madame A’s house, where there is a lot of ‘golden’ things mentioned (golden being tantamount to orange) and which the second narrator believes he painted (although not remembering his painting of it!) — the same as the actual painting that the first narrator wanted to keep as sole keepsake, thus to be saved from the proposed ‘bonfire’ of paintings? (See my by-chance concurrent real-time review of ‘The Burnt Orange Heresy’ from 1971 HERE.) The socially difficult psychology when dealing with women of both narrators is similar. A parental accident by air travel to Paris. A mother and father arguing about such a trip, then both killed by it. Why is this significant? A painting seeming to be painted by someone else, self-taught by the extra soul within? “It is a commonplace that there is often more than one soul in a single body.” A painter called Xavier Mellery who claimed “that he painted silence.” One of many painters that the second narrator treated as “stations on a spiritual ascent.” Reaching Madame A’s house, as if part of Aickman’s obsession with gluey Zenoism. Indeed, on ‘the very last stretch’ of this journey, he says he ceases to be anxious. Towards golden walls and golden frames. With furnishings “to spring upwards in ecstasy, to sag in melancholia…” And a life-size marble figure of a woman giving birth to a succubus. Madame A. herself, “perfectly agile, but curiously uncouth in her movements”, later “standing dumpily”, but with golden slippers on her feet. She tells of a man who was madly in love with her whom she wouldn’t have used as pocket handkerchief for her grippe! The mediocre or self-abusing or dull painters she lists by alphabetical letters — as if her own name of A. started this list? Much talk of Madame A’s pretty ‘adopted daughter’ Chrysothème, whom we never see but we can run our hands through her clothes. Even kiss them. One dress was “some kind of mottled orange and red.” The aforementioned crucial painting was, I think, a cross between an angel and a clown, and I may dream later that I hang above this story like one of its readers lit up…. “… on the single golden light that hung by a golden chain from the golden ceiling of the landing…”, except the exact context subsumed this hope? “I am trying to set down events and my feelings exactly as they were, or as nearly as possible…” — taken the words out of my mouth, as it were!
|
|
|
Post by Jojo Lapin X on Jul 24, 2021 12:50:24 GMT
Aickman's "Ravissante" isn't primarily about togs, but it does have an inimitably strange plunge into a drawer. Mind you, "The Residence at Whitminster" gives you a good reason not to open one. RAVISSANTE by Robert Aickman “One trouble was that I most certainly did not want to understand everything.” “If one goes to parties or meets many new people in any other way, one has to take protective action…” RAvissante— upon my re-reading of it, just now — has jumped back, like the “black poodle” of the less-than-ravishing Madame A., into an erstwhile twin-souled sump as the formative religious experience it once was, now further evolved. A story imparted by the less-than-ravishing Aickman himself whereby his drag often drags? The story that will either change your life or make you abandon it altogether! It reminds me of my own thoughts about creating stories or arguably outlandish reviews of them like this one, if one equates them with RA’s ‘pictures’ in this story, viz: “My pictures are visionary and symbolical, and, from first to last, have seemed to be painted by someone other than myself. […] I am thus entirely self-taught, or taught by that other within me. I am aware that my pictures lack serious technique(if there is a technique that can be distinguished from inspiration and invention). I should have given up painting them some time ago, were it not that a certain number of people seemed to find something remarkable in them, and have thus identified me with them, and made me feel mildly important.” But then I address RA’s later explicit destruction in this story of my beliefs in ‘The Intentional Fallacy’ with regard to his narrator’s inner narrator’s view of paintings and painters, with this narrator uselessly seeking to know everything about each painter as a personality and a biography. So, I now flounder in finding a meaning in this work by RA without knowing more about RA himself. But I want to deal with it empirically or objectively without recourse to such biographical information. Therefore, let’s now go through the story during a new tranche of real-time… viz. The first narrator — having met the second narrator (whose narration of his earlier meeting with Madame A. in Belgium comprises the full final two-thirds of the story’s whole) — is made executor (alongside the second narrator’s mostly silent wife) of the second narrator’s Will. The latter’s paintings and manuscripts, mainly. Is the remarkable painting — seen in Madame A’s house, where there is a lot of ‘golden’ things mentioned (golden being tantamount to orange) and which the second narrator believes he painted (although not remembering his painting of it!) — the same as the actual painting that the first narrator wanted to keep as sole keepsake, thus to be saved from the proposed ‘bonfire’ of paintings? (See my by-chance concurrent real-time review of ‘The Burnt Orange Heresy’ from 1971 HERE.) The socially difficult psychology when dealing with women of both narrators is similar. A parental accident by air travel to Paris. A mother and father arguing about such a trip, then both killed by it. Why is this significant? A painting seeming to be painted by someone else, self-taught by the extra soul within? “It is a commonplace that there is often more than one soul in a single body.” A painter called Xavier Mellery who claimed “that he painted silence.” One of many painters that the second narrator treated as “stations on a spiritual ascent.” Reaching Madame A’s house, as if part of Aickman’s obsession with gluey Zenoism. Indeed, on ‘the very last stretch’ of this journey, he says he ceases to be anxious. Towards golden walls and golden frames. With furnishings “to spring upwards in ecstasy, to sag in melancholia…” And a life-size marble figure of a woman giving birth to a succubus. Madame A. herself, “perfectly agile, but curiously uncouth in her movements”, later “standing dumpily”, but with golden slippers on her feet. She tells of a man who was madly in love with her whom she wouldn’t have used as pocket handkerchief for her grippe! The mediocre or self-abusing or dull painters she lists by alphabetical names — as if her own name of A. started this list? Much talk of Madame A’s pretty ‘adopted daughter’ Chrysothème, whom we never see but we can run our hands through her clothes. Even kiss them. One dress was “some kind of mottled orange and red.” The aforementioned crucial painting was, I think, a cross between an angel and a clown, and I may dream later that I hang above this story like one of its readers lit up…. “… on the single golden light that hung by a golden chain from the golden ceiling of the landing…”, except the exact context subsumed this hope? “I am trying to set down events and my feelings exactly as they were, or as nearly as possible…” — taken the words out of my mouth, as it were! I love the last few lines of this story, and often recite them to myself.
|
|
|
Post by weirdmonger on Jul 24, 2021 13:25:47 GMT
RAVISSANTE by Robert Aickman I love the last few lines of this story, and often recite them to myself. I wholeheartedly agree. I did not quote them as I thought that might have been a spoiler.
|
|
|
Post by dem on Jul 30, 2021 13:09:24 GMT
Amos Sewell Eugene de Rezske - The Veil of Tanit: ( Strange Tales, March 1932). Even to set eyes on it is blasphemy punishable by torture porn. Aliya Whiteley - Pack Your Coat: (Mark Morris [ed.], New Fears 2, 2018). Orange, unisex, lethal. P. Whitehouse - A Shawl From The East: John Gawsworth [ed.], Masterpiece Of Thrills[/i], 1936. If you won't have me, I'll make damn sure no-one will want you.
|
|
|
Post by Middoth on Aug 11, 2021 11:04:33 GMT
In the Mirror by Valery Bryusov (The Thrill of Horror ed. Hugh Lamb)
From the early the narrator, the young girl is fascinated by mirrors, the world of mysterious looking glass
|
|
|
Post by weirdmonger on Aug 11, 2021 12:52:11 GMT
In the Mirror by Valery Bryusov (The Thrill of Horror ed. Hugh Lamb)
From the early the narrator, the young girl is fascinated by mirrors, the world of mysterious looking glass
I have just completed my review below and uncannily I have now found this perfect spot to post it. Strange coincidence! I wrote this review just now before seeing this post above. ======================= NO STRONGER THAN A FLOWER by Robert Aickman“…a woman’s appearance is what a man most cares about, yet, too often, the more she does about it the less he cares for the result and for her.” Of its time, this story is essentially reprehensible as well as inscrutable — inscrutable unless there is a clue in the fact that Nesta’s silver candelabra are explicitly described as “writhing” — whence, later, the candlelight by which she sees herself in the monumental tall mirror at the end arguably reveals an eccentric Aickman-like version of Medusa? Nesta had started having a mutually comfortable marriage with Curtis, until he foolhardily encourages her to do something about her comparative plainness of appearance, and she then visits by taxi a row of terraced houses, where ‘the elderly or the disappointed’ generally live, to receive some sort of makeover that she had seen in an advert. The nature of this makeover is airbrushed by Aickman, and even the taxi driver warns her against going into one of those houses but eventually leaving her there, apparently happy not to be paid by her for the journey! Then it is the exungulation of Nesta’s fingernails that takes sharp prominence during the remaining process of entropy in her marriage to Curtis, while her face, if not always her appetising mouth, is constantly veiled…. Not to speak of the many hats she now sports at various times. Not a Medusa after all perhaps but more something that has been airbrushed into the philosopher A.J. Ayer’s drogulus? (I wouldn’t be surprised if Aickman knew Ayer.) PS: My very short ‘The Exungulation of the Drogulus’, first published in 2012 — dflewisreviews.wordpress.com/the-drogulus/, written before I realised today that it might have been inspired by this Aickman story from when I first read it in the 20th century. This Aickman story came up completely fresh for me today, but my memory is notoriously bad, and that is the reason I now review books as recorded in real-time!
|
|
|
Post by Middoth on Aug 11, 2021 18:45:27 GMT
Is Nesta Stepford wife, like Sally?
|
|
|
Post by weirdmonger on Aug 11, 2021 19:09:34 GMT
Is Nesta Stepford wife, like Sally? good question
|
|